Cases 1 - 10 of 1,931
Martinez v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
as 5:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Santos Guillen Martinez
Defendant:
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Vasiliki LLC v. Thelma Viera et al
as 8:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Vasiliki LLC
Defendant:
Thelma Viera and Romina Santos
Vanegas et al v. Luchini et al
as 5:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
Santiago Santos Vanegas, Maria Teresa Lopez, Celvin Santiago Santos Velaszuez and others
Defendant:
Brett Lee Luchini and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Willis v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
as 24-3154
Plaintiff:
BYRON WILLIS
Defendant:
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD and SANTOS LUEVANO
Chavez Chavez v. Garland
as 24-3060
Petitioner:
SANTOS F CHAVEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
De Los Santos-Ocana v. Garland
as 24-3029
Petitioner:
ALAIN DE LOS SANTOS-OCANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dos Santos Coutinho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2961
Petitioner:
FABIO DOS SANTOS COUTINHO, ANA CAROLINE BRITOS SANTOS and ANA SOPHIA DOS SANTOS COUTINHO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
