Cases 1 - 10 of 32,809
B.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03443
Plaintiff:
B. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cross v. Conduent Business Services LLC, d/b/a Direct Express
as 2:2024cv04780
Plaintiff:
Susan Cross
Defendant:
Conduent Business Services LLC, d/b/a Direct Express
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GS Holistic, LLC v. L.D.B Sharabi LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
L.D.B Sharabi LLC doing business as Tustin B Smoke Shop and Jamal Al Sharabi Bahaeddin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
NINGBO JIANGBEI SWEET TIME ECOMMERCE CO., LIMITED v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04757
Plaintiff:
NINGBO JIANGBEI SWEET TIME ECOMMERCE CO., LIMITED
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and DOE 1, d/b/a ODORHEISAYO d/b/a SAILING LU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baus v. Fluent, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Steve Baus
Defendant:
Fluent, Inc. and Fluent, LLC d/b/a SaveToday
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alvarado Suarez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3572
Petitioner:
MARIA MAYRANE ALVARADO SUAREZ, SANTIAGO MIGUEL GUEVARA ALVARADO, MARIA DULCE ALVARADO SUAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Pablo v. Garland
as 24-3573
Petitioner:
FLORENTIN GARCIA PABLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez Chavelas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3550
Petitioner:
ANGELICA MARTINEZ CHAVELAS, ANARELI CASTRO MARTINEZ and JESUS MANUEL CASTRO MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
