Cases 1 - 10 of 271
(SS) McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00708
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Titus Petterson v. GEO Group et al
as 2:2024cv04913
Defendant:
Counselor Rosales, Warden N. T. McKinney, F.B.O.P. Officer Topete and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP v. Delaney Ahern et al
as 8:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Delany Ahern and Louie Mckinney
Plaintiff:
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Zachary McKinney v. Munchkin, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04338
Defendant:
Munchkin, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zachary McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ploof v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03026
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and David McKinney
Plaintiff:
Jon Ploof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP v. Ahern et al
as 8:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Bridge WF CA Crystal View LP
Defendant:
Delany Ahern and Louie Mckinney
Darrel R Fisher v. Gerald McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Gerald McKinney and Larry DiCieno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKiney v. Newson
as 2:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKiney, Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Respondent:
Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. McKinney
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner:
Ocean Maite Francis
Respondent:
Warden A. Dulgov and Warden Nancy McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
