Cases 1 - 10 of 2,495
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 24-3051
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sanchez v. St. Andre, et al.
as 24-2914
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ROB ST. ANDRE and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
