Cases 1 - 10 of 33
ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY A/S/O CLAYTON NORCROSS v. Flores Delgado et al
as 2:2024cv03934
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY A/S/O CLAYTON NORCROSS
Defendant:
Madelline Dayana Flores Delgado, Leonel Alberto Flores and 16 DOES 1 TO 25
Cross Defendant:
Eddis William Watkins, MID CY LSG and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Flores v. Instagram LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Alberto Flores
Defendant:
Instagram LLC, Facebook Operations LLC, Facebook Payments Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States of America v. $51,574 in United States Currency
as 3:2020cv01405
Defendant:
$51,574 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Alberto Flores
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Jorge Alberto Flores, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv01557
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Flores, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA v. Maya Nudel et al
as 2:2019cv10099
Defendant:
Judy Simon, Carlos Alvarado, Does 1-10 inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA
Enrique Balboa-Palacios v. William Barr
as 19-72495
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE BALBOA-PALACIOS, AKA Alberto Flores-Alarcon, AKA Cesar Gaona-Rodriguez, AKA Xavier Palacios, AKA Jose Suarez-Perez
Raul Flores-Medina v. William Barr
as 19-71303
Petitioner:
RAUL ALBERTO FLORES-MEDINA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Luis Alberto Flores v. J. Sullivan
as 2:2018cv01595
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Flores
Respondent:
J. Sullivan
Carlos Flores-Turcios v. Dana J. Boente
as 17-70091
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO FLORES-TURCIOS
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
