Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Angel Torres v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02367
Petitioner: Angel Torres
Respondent: B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. Jose Torres-Guardado
as 22-35600
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JOSE ANGEL TORRES-GUARDADO
Torres-Guardado v. USA
as 1:2022cv00074
Petitioner: Jose Angel Torres-Guardado
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Angel Torres v. County of Riverside
as 5:2022cv01179
Plaintiff: Angel Torres
Defendant: County of Riverside, a legal subdivision of the State of California, County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
Elmerson Zelaya-Aparicio, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70415
Petitioner: NALLELY GISSEL GARCIA-TORRES, FABIO EFRAIN ZELAYA-TORRES, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES TORRES-VIGIL and others
Respondent: ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
USA v. Angel Torres We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-30177
Defendant / Appellant: ANGEL TORRES
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Angel Torres v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16392
Petitioner - Appellant: ANGEL TORRES
Respondent - Appellee: DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nguyen et al v. Kent et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv01255
Plaintiff: Jenny Nguyen and Vivian Nguyen
Defendant: Thomas A. Kent, Angel Torres and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Angel Torres v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16292
Petitioner - Appellant: ANGEL TORRES
Respondent - Appellee: DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
USA v. Torres et al
as 8:2018mj00007
Defendant: Emma Candelaria Benanvides Ayala (2) and Miguel Angel Torres (1)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?