Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2018cv01835
Defendant:
M. Polland, J.V. Garcia, C.E. Ducart and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aaron et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03054
Plaintiff:
Vickie Aaron , Helen Adams , Carolyn Anderson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
George Jacobs, IV v. S. Sztukowski, et al
as 13-15451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV
Defendant:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, A. C. QUINONES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MASIEL, B. DAVID and J. M. MARTINEZ
Barry Lamon v. J. Masiel, et al
as 11-17796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY LOUIS LAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MASIEL, Correctional Officer, L. MENDOZA, Correctional Officer, B. DAVID, Correctional Officer and others
Freeman v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Travon Leon Freeman
Defendant:
Derrall G. Adams, George A. Finley, R. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. Mehmet v. USDC-CASJ
as 08-74425
:
In re: B. DAVID MEHMET
Petitioner:
B. DAVID MEHMET
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
PAYPAL, INC.
B. Mehmet v. PayPal, Inc.
as 08-80154
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
B. DAVID MEHMET
Defendant - Respondent:
PAYPAL, INC.
Robinson v. Adams et al
as 1:2008at00522
Plaintiff:
George H Robinson
Defendant:
D. Adams, D. Ruiz, B. David and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson v. Adams, et al.
as 1:2008cv01380
Plaintiff:
George H Robinson
Defendant:
D. Adams, D. Ruiz, B. David and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
