Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Buckner et al v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Buckner, Ben Docena, Carlos Collier and others
Defendant:
Triple Canopy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McCarter v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Roy Rusch McCarter
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, District Attorney Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Wood et al
as 2:2020cv00818
Plaintiff:
Nicole Greene
Defendant:
Benjamin Wood and Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northwest Osteoscreening, Inc. et al v. Mountain View Hospital, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Northwest Osteoscreening, Inc. , Idaho Health Screenings and Vaccinations, LLC , Preventative Health, LLC and others
Defendant:
Mountain View Hospital, LLC, Benjamin Wood, James Adamson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
James Lyall, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 13-56122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DUFF LYALL, individually and as class representatives, JAVIER CORTEZ, individually and as class representatives, MAGNOLIA BECERRA, individually and as class representatives and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, DAVID ROSS, (#33632), individually and in his official capacity, JOHNNY CERVANTES, (#27374), individually and in his official capacity and others
James Duff Lyall et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv07353
Plaintiff:
James Duff Lyall, Javier Cortez, D'Angelo Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Deparment, William Bratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Efrain Ornelas et al v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2009cv06374
Plaintiff:
Efrain Ornelas, Angela Sambrano, Arturo Jimenez and others
Defendant:
City of Pomona, City of Pomona, Joe Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
