Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 22-35699
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES
Defendant / Appellee: M. ROJAS, In her official and individual capacity as law librarian of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, PAYNTER, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Officer-in-Charge of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, HOUSTON, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Reviewing Officer of Misconduct Report at the Snake River Correctional Institution and others
Mike Redford v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73469
Not Classified By Court: In re: MIKE REDFORD, RAJEEV V. DATE, Director, individual capacity, PHILIP LERMA, official capacity and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner: MIKE REDFORD
Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff: Brandon Thompson
Defendant: Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 19-35594
Defendant / Appellee: J. HOLLOPETER, In his Official and Individual Corridor Officer on Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BILL DOMAN, in his official and individual capacity as acting assistant superintendent of correctional rehabilitation and senior supervisor of law library services and M. Rojas and H. Mackenzie at the Snake River Correctional Institution, MARK NOOTH, in his individual and official capacity as eastside institution administrator of the Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, AKA Charles J. Johnson, AKA Charles James Johnson, AKA Asmar H. Saleem, AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem
USA v. Thompson
as 2:2018mj01030
Defendant: Brandon Thompson (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Brandon Thompson
as 2:2018mj01030
Defendant: Brandon Thompson (1)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?