Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Porter et al v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Ashton Porter and Gianna Porter
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg, Brian Addington, Ernesto Mejia-Orozco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malott v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv01674
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, Jay Hill, Will Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Malott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reasoner v. City of Pittsburg Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv07674
Defendant:
Michael Keefe, Jason Cano, City of Pittsburg Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Reasoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simoni v. Addington et al
as 3:2018cv03232
Defendant:
Brian Addington, City of Pittsburg California, Raquel Curran and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Simoni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Martinez, et al., v. City of Pittsburg, et al.,
as 3:2017cv04246
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg , Brian Addington , Ernesto Mejia and others
Plaintiff:
Humberto Martinez , H. R. M. , A. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derby v. City of Pittsburg California et al
as 3:2016cv05469
Plaintiff:
Wade Derby
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg California, City of Pittsburg Police Department and Brian Addington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
