Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Thompson v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs, et al.
as 23-2050
Petitioner:
ERIC A. DUPREE
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY/CNA INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court:
CHARLES THOMPSON
Eric Dupree v. Resource Consultants, et al
as 22-70046
Petitioner:
ERIC A. DUPREE, former attorney for Claimant
Respondent:
RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY/CNA INTERNATIONAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
CHARLES THOMPSON
Eric Dupree v. Resource Consultants, et al
as 22-70021
Petitioner:
ERIC A. DUPREE, former attorney for Claimant
Respondent:
RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY/CNA INTERNATIONAL, TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
CHARLES THOMPSON
Maryland Casualty Company et al v. Evanston Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv01762
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company and Assurance Company of America
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company , AIG Specialty Insurance Company , American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chartis Insurance Company China Limited et al v. Cargo Solution Express, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00407
Defendant:
Cargo Solution Express Inc
Plaintiff:
Chartis Insurance Company China Limited and YiFang Digital Technology Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Chartis Insurance Company China Limited et al v. Con-Way Truckload Services
as 2:2013cv01414
Plaintiff:
Chartis Insurance Company China Limited and YiFang Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Con-Way Truckload Services
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Grant Wilson v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, et al
as 12-73530
Petitioner:
GRANT L. WILSON
Respondent:
HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
