Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sones de Mexico Ensemble et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sones de Mexico Ensemble, The Chain Smokers, Stevie Wonder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-16045
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PEDIATRICIANS, CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS CENTER, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CATHOLIC NURSES, USA
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner:
State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party:
County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae:
Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Tucson Women's Center, et al v. Arizona Medical Board, et al
as 09-17673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TUCSON WOMEN'S CENTER, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATES, WILLIAM RICHARDSON, M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA MEDICAL BOARD, LISA WYNN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Arizona Medical Board and TERRY L. GODDARD, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL ASSOCIATIONS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
ARIZONA LEGISLATORS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
