Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Durgan v. U-Haul International Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01565
Plaintiff:
Felicia Durgan, Evan Hatchell, Kasio Young and others
Defendant:
U-Haul International Incorporated
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chris Bagley, Joseph Laventure, Jr., Daniel Tooker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Tucker
as 2:2021cv02049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Tucker
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Gemcap Lending I, LLC v. William Pertl, et al
as 20-55642
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM SHANE PERTL, an individual and MINDY J. MONTGOMERY, an individual
Defendant:
DOES, 1-25, inclusive, JONATHON W. DAVIS, an individual, MARTIN MCNEIL, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEMCAP LENDING I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
GemCap Lending I, LLC v. Shane William Pertl et al
as 2:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Martin, McNeil, Van Osdol, PC, William Shane Pertl, Jonathon W. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
GEMCAP LENDING I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Terry Hodges v. Christopher Tucker et al
as 2:2015cv05158
Defendant:
Does, Netflix, Inc. and Christopher Tucker
Counter Defendant:
Terry Hodges and Terry Hodges
Plaintiff:
Terry Hodges
Counter Claimant:
Christopher Tucker and Christopher Tucker
Fisher et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Group et al
as 4:2008cv03121
Plaintiff:
Justine Fisher and Jose Marquez
Defendant:
Christopher Tucker, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Fisher et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Group et al
as 3:2008cv03121
Plaintiff:
Justine Fisher and Jose Marquez
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group and Christopher Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
