Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pena v. Juul Labs, Inc., Previously D/B/A As Pax Labs, Inc. And Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08375
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pena
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wendy Urias-De Pena, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72254
Petitioner:
WENDY ELIZABETH URIAS-DE PENA, AKA Wendy Elizabeth Urias, EMELYN LILIAN PENA-URIAS, VICTOR DANIEL PENA-URIAS and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
James v. Lee et al
as 3:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert James
Defendant:
Barbara Lee, Christine Harvel, Jeff Duckworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Acedo v. County of San Diego Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acedo
Defendant:
County of San Diego Sheriff Dept, Daniel Pena, Christina Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Gore et al
as 3:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert Mark Brown, II
Defendant:
William Gore, Daniel Pena, K. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordaz v. San Diego County Jail et al
as 3:2013cv03069
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ordaz
Defendant:
San Diego County Jail, William D. Gore, Daniel Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodall v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2013cv02231
Plaintiff:
Shawn James Allen Woodall
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, William Gore, Earl Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Pena v. Larry Small
as 12-17077
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL PENA
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SMALL, Warden
Pena v. Small
as 1:2009cv01494
Petitioner:
Daniel Pena
Respondent:
Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. Small
as 2:2009cv02293
Petitioner:
Daniel Pena
Respondent:
Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
