Cases 1 - 10 of 37
(PC) Gray v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Defendant:
M. Muslim, S. McCambridge, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wattleton v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego
as 24-4540
Petitioner:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGELIO VELA, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
(PC) Williams v. LaCoursier et al
as 2:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
David Earl Williams
Defendant:
Mark LaCoursier, Ashad Ali, Samer Hammoudeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos v. Maxson et al
as 2:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
David Earl Ray Gallegos
Defendant:
Peter L Maxson, Jr, Michael M Silva and Brittany A Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Williams v. Michael Martel
as 22-16370
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden
David Farnsworth v. Andrew Saul
as 21-35088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL FARNSWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Nagui Mankaruse v. Raytheon Company, et al
as 20-55192
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY R. KERRY, an individual, RICHARD ROCKE, an individual, KEITH PEDEN, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGUI MANKARUSE
(PC) Granderson v. California Corrections Rehabilitations et al
as 2:2019cv02211
Defendant:
Celeslino Rodriguez, Jorge Rodriguez, Gabriel Aguilar and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Granderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Granderson v. Griffith
as 2:2019cv02212
Defendant:
Griffith
Plaintiff:
David Earl Granderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagui Mankaruse et al v. Raytheon Company et al
as 8:2019cv01904
Defendant:
F. Kinsey Hafner, Richard Rocke, Matthew Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Nagui Mankaruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
