Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In re: Omer Al Obaidy v. USDC-CASF
as 17-72122
:
In re: OMER AL OBAIDY
Petitioner:
OMER AL OBAIDY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN F. KELLY, REX W. TILLERSON, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General and others
Afsaneh Khorramian et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 2:2017cv04543
Defendant:
John R Bass, David T. Donahue, John F. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Afsaneh Khorramian and Mohammad Reza Sharifi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cruz et al v. Ramotowski et al
as 3:2010cv00539
Defendant:
Lisa Barker, Hillary Rodham Clinton, David T. Donahue and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca L. Cruz and Nestor Mendoza-Flores
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
