Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Dias v. Avila et al
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sean Dias
Defendant:
William Avila and Dominick Garay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dias v. Avila et al
as 1:2024at00250
Plaintiff:
Sean Dias
Defendant:
William Avila and Dominick Garay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Leticia Castaon Garcia et al v. St. Mary's Medical Center et al
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Martha Leticia Castaon Garcia, Ruben Reyes Dias and Martha Leticia Castanon Garcia
Defendant:
ST. MARYS MEDICAL CENTER, Katherine Tran, Sergeant Wu # 2036 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Da Silva Vieira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4065
Petitioner:
RENNAN DA SILVA VIEIRA, YASMIN DIAS FERREIRA and SANTIAGO DIAS DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hurtado Dias v. Garland
as 23-919
Petitioner:
JULIAN APARICIO HURTADO DIAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dias v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Deena L. Dias
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Mark Dias et al v. Spartan Micro, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mark Dias, Shanghai Yonghua Capital Investment Management Co. LTD., Suzhou Quantong Medical Tech. Co. LTD. and others
Defendant:
Spartan Micro, Inc., Eric Stoppenhagen, Thomas Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Arlen Dale Dias v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
ARLEN DALE DIAS
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
