Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Roofers Local 149 Pension Fund v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., et al
as 15-55945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 149 PENSION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, LEWIS W. COLEMAN and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PADDOCK
Phan v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv05150
Plaintiff:
Van Phan
Defendant:
Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wentworth v. Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC et al
as 3:2014cv04422
Plaintiff:
David Wentworth
Defendant:
Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC , Pixar , Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cano v. Pixar et al
as 5:2014cv04203
Plaintiff:
Georgia Cano
Defendant:
Pixar , Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Lucasfilm LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv04062
Defendant:
Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Movant:
David Wentworth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ignacio Moreno v. Jeffrey Katzenberg et al
as 2:2014cv06914
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Moreno
Defendant:
Richard E. Sullivan, Harry M. Brittenham, Thomas E. Freston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Roffe 401K Plan 002 UAD 01/01/12 v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06201
Plaintiff:
Brian Roffe 401K Plan 002 UAD 1/01/2012
Defendant:
Lewis W. Coleman, Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., Jeffrey Katzenberg and others
Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06053
Defendant:
Lewis W. Coleman, Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. and Jeffrey Katzenberg
Plaintiff:
Charles Paddock
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Eopus Innovations LLC v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc
as 2:2013cv09552
Defendant:
Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc
Plaintiff:
Eopus Innovations LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
