Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 530
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff: John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant: Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. Five9, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02203
Plaintiff: Travis Fitzgerald
Defendant: Five9, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2011 - Veteran's Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Murphy v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: Douglas Murphy
Defendant: Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff: Douglas Murphy
Defendant: Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Moore
as 24-1937
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BERRYON FITZGERALD MOORE, III
Duke v. Josefowicz
as 24-1785
Petitioner: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER JOSEFOWICZ
Duke v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1524
Petitioner: BRENT FITZGERALD DUKE
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Sivak v. Fitzgerald, et al.
as 24-1360
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: LISA FITZGERALD, BRIDGET S. BADE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, KENNETH K. LEE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00748
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?