Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Reuther v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Scot Alan Reuther
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Joseph Bugher, Jesus Legardaj, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Platte River Insurance Company v. Yamakawa et al
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nelly Akemi Yamakawa, Michael Stephen Starnes, Rogue Valley Manor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Weaver v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Richard Francis Weaver
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Moriam Balogun, Leland P. Beamer, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stoll v. Stoll et al
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
James Frances Stoll and James Francis Stoll
Defendant:
Michael William Stoll, Maryann Teresa Stoll, ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
