Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kristin Hart, et al v. City of Redwood City, et al
as 22-17008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KRISTIN HART, individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART, E. H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART and W. H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation, DANIEL MULHOLLAND, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY and others
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ricardo Ruiz Gomez et al
as 2:2020cv09025
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Wendy's Tortas, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Wendy's Tortas, Ricardo Ruiz Gomez individually and d/b/a Wendy's Tortas, Wendys Tortas, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Wendys Tortas and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 521
Ellen Keates, et al v. Michael Koile, et al
as 20-16015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELLEN KEATES
Defendant:
SARAH JENKINS, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services, KAREN HOWARD, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services, STATE OF ARIZONA, a political entity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KOILE, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services and KIMBERLY PENDER, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services
Plaintiff:
A. K., a minor, through her parent and guardian Ellen Keates
Balubhai Patel, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 18-55983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALUBHAI G. PATEL, VIRANBHAI PATEL, ANDRES CASTRO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Christopher Lancaster v. USDC-CARIV
as 17-73003
:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN MALE NURSE, individual & official capacity, PRICE, individual, PRICE, Nurse-official capacity and others
Ellen Keates, et al v. Michael Koile, et al
as 16-16568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLEN KEATES and A. K., a minor, through her parent and guardian Ellen Keates
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KOILE, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services, KAREN HOWARD, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services, GILLIAN VANESSE, individually as an employee with the State of Arizona Child Protective Services and others
Faith James, et al v. USA
as 13-56370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAITH VICTORIA JAMES, individually and as Successor In Interest to THE ESTATE OF PAUL F. JAMES GOMEZ and PAUL FRANK GOMEZ, individually and as Successor In Interest to THE ESTATE OF PAUL F. JAMES GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Company
as 13-55486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE GOMEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMPBELL-EWALD COMPANY
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-56744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
