Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Close v. Ivy Medical et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brynn Marie Close
Defendant:
Ivy Medical, TFCJ, Doug Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Baskin, et al.
as 1:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Onis Garcia
Defendant:
Judicial Office Nancy Baskin, Ada County Prosecuto Jan Bennetts, Prosecuting Attorney Jill Longhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frontier Credit Union v. Serr, et al.
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Frontier Credit Union and formerly East Idaho Credit Union, an Idaho state-chartered credit union
Defendant:
Adam C. Serr, Sr., Shayla Lynn Kelley, Kristin L. Bergeson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Miller et al v. Kensington Apartments, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00340
Defendant:
Hawkins Companies, LLC, Bach Homes, LLC, Kensington Apartments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marcella Miller and Sarah Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Yordy et al
as 1:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Jay Christenson, Corizon LLC, Keith Yordy and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christensen et al
as 1:2018cv00396
Respondent:
Jay Christensen and Keith Yordy
Petitioner:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00373
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
