Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cao Hui v. Leon Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Cao Hui and Hui Cao
Petitioner:
Director Mark J Hazuda
Defendant:
USCIS USCIS, Laura Zuchowski, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tran et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Cuong Tran, Huy Tran, Ket Tran and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, Spirit Aerosystems, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Boat People S.O.S., Inc. et al v. VOICE et al
as 8:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Boat People S.O.S., Inc., Dr. Thang Dinh Nguyen, Fr. Joseph Thien Nguyen and others
Defendant:
VOICE (Vietnamese Overseas Initiative for Conscience Empowerment), VOICE Canada, Nam Loc Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
