Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Scripps Health v. Humana Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Scripps Health
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company, Humana Health Plan, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stanford Health Care v. Humana Health Plan of California, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv06611
Plaintiff:
Stanford Health Care
Defendant:
Humana Health Plan of California, Inc. and Humana Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stanford Health Care v. Humana Health Plan of California, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06610
Plaintiff:
Stanford Health Care
Defendant:
Humana Health Plan of California, Inc. and Humana Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital et al v. Humana Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv05898
Plaintiff:
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital and Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company, Humana Health Plan, Inc., DOES 1 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Defendant / Appellee:
AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM, INC., DBA Anthem Health, Inc. and others
In re: Law Offices of Ben C. Martin v. Babbitt & Johnson PA, et al
as 22-15872
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DORIS JONES, GEORGE LEUS, GARY MILTON and others
Appellee:
BABBITT & JOHNSON PA, BARON & BUD, PC, COMMON BENEFIT FEE AND COST COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey corporation and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., a subsidiary and/or Division of defendant C.R. Bard, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Appellant:
LAW OFFICES OF BEN C. MARTIN and MARTIN BAUGHMAN PLLC
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN MOTTAS, CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Santa Barbara Cottage v. Humana Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv03211
Plaintiff:
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company, Humana Health Plan of California, Inc., Humana Health Plan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital v. Humana Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv05634
Plaintiff:
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, a California for-profit corporation and Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Petitioner:
Does 1 through 25, Inclusive,
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company, a Wisconsin for-profit corporation, Humana Health Plan of California, Inc., a California corporation;, Humana Health Plan, Inc., a Delaware for-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
The Regents of the University of California et al v. Humana Health Plan of California, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01742
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Humana Health Plan of California, Inc., a California corporation;, Humana Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California, a public trust corporation, on behalf of The University of California, Irvine Medical Center and The Regents of The University of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health & Life Ins. Co., et al
as 20-55821
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS CITY, HUMANA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.