Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dorothy Maraglino v. J. Espinoza
as 20-55914
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOROTHY GRACE MARIE MARAGLINO
Respondent / Appellee:
J. ESPINOZA
Anthony Moreno v. V. Hull et al
as 5:2020cv00272
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, Hernandez, A. DeLeon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 2:2020cv00187
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 1:2020cv00173
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Pinson v. Ivey, et al
as 19-17293
Defendant:
DOES, named as: Unknown Parties Officer 1 and Officer 2, WILLIAMS, named as Registered Nurse, JOSE CASTILLO, Regional Director and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and IVEY, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, AKA Jeremy Pinson
Ernest Espinoza v. Matt Ashe, et al
as 19-16864
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a government entity, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a government entity, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a government entity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST J. ESPINOZA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT A. ASHE, an individual
(HC) Norsworthy v. Espinoza
as 1:2019cv00847
Petitioner:
Michelle-Lael Bryanna Norsworthy
Respondent:
J. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barbara Ann Hamel v. J. Espinoza
as 8:2019cv00722
Petitioner:
Barbara Ann Hamel
Respondent:
J. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hagiwara v. Rao et al
as 1:2019cv00189
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Edeltraud Hagiwara and Edeltraud Hagiwara
Defendant:
J. Espinoza, Ravi D. Rao and Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
