Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Arnold v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00025
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Sandi Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
David Ray Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe #1 et al v. City of Simi Valley et al
as 2:2017cv06846
Defendant:
City of Simi Valley and David M. Livingstone
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, John Doe #1 and others
Smith v. Clackamas County et al
as 2:2016cv01691
Defendant:
Clackamas County, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office/Department et al
as 2:2016cv00572
Defendant:
Deputy Bull, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baugh v. Lynch et al
as 3:2015cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Shawn Collins Telkamp v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2015cv01093
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Collins Telkamp
Anthony Archuleta v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv03801
Plaintiff:
Anthony Archuleta
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv07262
Defendant:
Kathleen Blanchard, Kathleen Blanchard, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
LaKeith Leroy McCoy
Anthony Mario Jimenez v. Upland Police Department et al
as 5:2014cv00417
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mario Jimenez
Angel V Jara v. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2014cv00237
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Angel V Jara
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
