Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cody Presti v. Darren Telefoni, et al
as 22-15194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CODY JOSEPH PRESTI
Defendant / Appellee:
DARREN TELEFONI, ACO, JOHNSON, Captain, WENDEL YODA, CBA and others
Daronta Lewis v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-15663
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, S. SHERMAN, NIKKI JOHNSON, Transport officer, SATF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS
Masoud Bamdad v. USA, et al
as 21-55288
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER, FITZGERALD, Lieutenant, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL LOPEZ, Officer, in his individual and official capacities, DANIEL MORENO, Officer, in his individual and official capacities, VINCENT LEGASPI, Lieutenant , in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MASOUD BAMDAD
Joseph George v. USA, et al
as 19-56528
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON CONGE, Deputy, JOHN DOE, Owner Mission Valley Orn and Marillo Facial Surgery, MARVIN MALECHA, President New School of Architecture and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE
Prison Legal News v. Paul Babeu, et al
as 13-15965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL R. BABEU, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinal County, Arizona, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, TONYA DELGADO, Sgt., in her individual and official capacities and others
Enrique Diaz v. B Coll, et al
as 09-16566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
B COLL, J. SAUNDERS, M. JOHNSON, Captain and others
Charles Chatman v. R. Johnson, et al
as 09-15497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. JOHNSON, Captain, J. EHRLICH, Sgt., ST. ANDRE, Sgt. and others
Charles Chatman v. USDC-CES
as 08-75017
:
In re: CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Petitioner:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
R. JOHNSON, Captain
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
