Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Juan Chavez v. American Express, et al
as 23-55808
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUAN PABLO CHAVEZ, Prince of New York
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN EXPRESS, HIGH YIELD SAVINGS, CASH APP and others
Smith v. Town of Chino Valley, et al.
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: TOWN OF CHINO VALLEY, a municipal corporation, CHINO VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation incorporated in the State of Arizona, UNKNOWN BROWN, named as RO Brown (CV21), individaully and as husband and others
Erick Dodakian v. Andrew Butters, et al
as 23-15484
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERICK JOHN DODAKIAN
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW BUTTERS, Badge #21242 and CITY OF TEMPE, AKA Tempe Police Department
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5, Black Corporations 1-5 and White Partnerships 1-5
Patsy Sakuma v. Assoc. of Apt. Owners of the Tropics at Waikele, et al
as 22-16929
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATSY N. SAKUMA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Renee Armenta v. City of Goodyear, et al
as 22-15965
Plaintiff / Appellant: RENEE ARMENTA, in her individual capacity
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF GOODYEAR, MATTHEW ROSS, a married man, Badge #1193, Goodyear Police Department, ROSS, named as Jane Doe Ross, a married woman and others
Arizona Public Service Company v. Mike Michael, et al
as 22-15853
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, an Arizona public service corporation
Defendant / Appellant: MIKE MICHAEL, an unmarried man, BONNIE MICHAEL, an unmarried woman and DARLENE DIANE SPAN
Defendant: MARSHALL C. PETERSON, individually and as a trustee of the Estate of Patricia P Peterson, COUNTY OF MARICOPA and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does I-X, Jane Does I-X, ABC Partnerships I-X, and XYZ Corporation or Other Entities I-X in original state complaint
Kenette Paredes, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-15459
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENETTE A. PAREDES
Plaintiff: EDGARD PAREDES, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba Department of the Navy, The Navy Exchange Mall at Pearl Harbor
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-10; Jane Does, 1-10; Doe Partnerships; Doe Corporations, 1-10; Doe Entities, 1-10; Roe Governmental Entities, 1-10
Kyra Bernhardt v. County of Hawaii, et al
as 21-16014
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10, STANLEY KAINA, in his individual capacity and as a Police Officer of the Hawaii Police Department and COUNTY OF HAWAII
Plaintiff / Appellant: KYRA BERNHARDT, in her individual capacity and as Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF GENE BERNHARDT aka MERVYN GENE BERNHARDT
Jes Solar Company Limited, et al v. Matinee Energy Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16015
Defendant / Appellee: TONG SOO CHUNG, husband and S. CHIN KIM, husband
Defendant: JEOUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Jeoung, wife, PAUL JEOUNG, husband, CHUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Chung, wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AIRPARK COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation, HANKOOK TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a South Korean Corporation and JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation
Tiffany Franco v. Mesa Public Schools, et al
as 21-15624
Defendant / Appellee: LISA SHUPE, ROSS PAGEL, JEREMY JONES and others
Defendant: PAGEL, First name unknown; named as Jane Doe, a married couple, SHUPE, First name unknown; named as John Doe, a married couple, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Black Corporations 1-10; White Partnerships 1-10 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIFFANY FRANCO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?