Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chandler v. DeJoy, et al.
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: JOHN W. CHANDLER
Defendant: LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Former Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15968
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35378
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15808
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16985
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-36009
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16842
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ronnie Todd v. Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, et al
as 22-16329
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant / Appellee: ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD, RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55382
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Daniel Brewer v. USPS, et al
as 22-35267
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL MCCOOK BREWER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General
Defendant: FEDERAL OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATION, of E.E.O.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?