Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Toscano v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
Ruben Toscano
Defendant:
V. Baldwin and M. Botello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baity v. Palmer, et al.
as 3:2019cv02961
Defendant:
M. Botello, J. Palmer and C. Koenig
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Baity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Baity v. Palmer, et al.
as 1:2019cv00692
Defendant:
M Botello, J. Palmer and C. Koenig
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Baity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades v. Robinson et al
as 5:2018cv07201
Defendant:
M. Botello, R. Robinson, D. Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Cole James Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kocak v. Mathisen et al
as 5:2017cv05984
Plaintiff:
John I. Kocak
Defendant:
Dennis Mathisen , California Department of Corrections and REhabilitation CTF- Soledad , Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Glass v. Scribner, et al
as 1:2004cv05953
Plaintiff:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
A K Scribner, K Anderson, C Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 09-17450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. ANDERSON, C. ESPINOZA and others
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 08-15491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
