Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Northwest Natural Goods, LLC v. Canopy Growth USA, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
Northwest Natural Goods, LLC
Defendant:
Canopy Growth USA, LLC and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Moshiri v. HSNi, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01034
Plaintiff:
Allen Moshiri
Defendant:
HSNi, LLC , Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. , Emeril's Homebase, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSHIRI v. HSNi, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Allen OFFICES OF FARR MOSHIRI
Defendant:
HSNi, LLC, MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC, EMERILS HOMEBASE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gregory Beauchamp v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06655
Plaintiff:
Gregory Beauchamp
Defendant:
Does and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc
Vampire Vineyards et al v. Martha Stewart et al
as 2:2010cv06650
Defendant:
Cornerstone Brands, Inc., Does, Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Machat and Vampire Vineyards
Vanessa Simmonds v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedi, et al
as 09-35380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VANESSA SIMMONDS
Defendant:
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA INC, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED and MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Vanessa Simmonds v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedi, et al
as 09-35333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANESSA SIMMONDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA INC, a Delaware corporation, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED and MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Simmonds v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 2:2007cv01605
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Simmonds, Vanessa Simmonds and Vanessa Simmonds
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & CO Inc and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
