Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hyduk v. Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307 et al
as 3:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Jayne Hyduk
Defendant:
Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307, California Department Of Healthcare Services, Washington DC Department Of Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Letricia Lavern Brown v. The State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Letricia Lavern Brown
Defendant:
SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, INC., erroneously sued herein as LOS ANGELES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, The State of California, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Antonio Luis Freire v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv04412
Plaintiff:
Antonio Luis Freire
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Regional Justice Center, Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bradley James Much v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv09292
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, AT and T, Actors, Actresses and Media Personalities and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Hurt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
as 3:2014mc80051
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Hurt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
as 3:2012cv06521
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hurt v. Corporation Council Office et al
as 4:2012cv04737
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
Corporation Council Office, City of Washington and D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
as 3:2012cv02943
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
