Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pfister v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Quincy Dean Pfister
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility, Officer Conner, Officer Dolbeare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flesch v. Lt. Metzger et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Vernon Flesch
Defendant:
Lt. Metzger, Lieutenant Bailey, Sgt. Goodyear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pines v. Linder et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Dawayne Pines, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Linder, Undersheriff Bofto, Commander Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grendahl v. Knisely et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Molly Woodmen, IRS Branch Manager, Mary Jane Knisely and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Grendahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mink v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Lt. Metzger, Correctional Health Partners, Y. Chret and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Aaron Mink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Lt. Bodine, John and Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metzger v. USA
as 1:2018cv00097
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Windfall, Inc. et al
as 9:2015cv00146
Petitioner:
Mid-Century Insurance Company
Respondent:
Windfall, Inc., Mettle, LLC, Jim McGowan and others
Counter_claimant:
Tia Metzger
Counter_defendant:
Mid-Century Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson et al v. Metzger et al
as 4:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Hanson and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Linda Metzger, Robert James, Rick Sheer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
