Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00837
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00834
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Michael Meyers v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2020cv04330
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Gigi Mattson
Petitioner:
Michael C. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C and H LLC, et al v. Allen, Haight and Monaghan LLP, et al
as 8:2019cv01357
Defendant:
Jeffrey M Verdon, Jeffrey M. Verdon Law Group, LLP, Lindzey M. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Chu, Calvin Lim, C and H Family LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01232
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Michael Scott v. Stephen H. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv08989
Defendant:
Michael L. Allison, Marcos Alvarado, Thomas M. Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Michael Thomas Meyer v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01894
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Michael Meyer
as 13-50133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JUSTIN MEYER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01775
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Dawud Malik v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 11-35797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWUD HALISI MALIK, AKA David Washington Riggins
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary, DOC, STEVE SINCLAIR, Supt, WSP, CLINT MAY, Captain, SCCC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
