Cases 1 - 10 of 497
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. trx.com, et al.
as 24-3391
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC
Defendant:
TRX.COM and LOO TZE MING
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ming et al
as 2:2024cv03704
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Tung Ming and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Ming et al
as 2:2024cv03705
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tung Ming and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. trx.com, et al.
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant:
TRX.COM, a domain name and LOO TZE MING, an individual from Malaysia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lollicup USA Inc. v. Precision Biotechnology Co. Ltd. et al
as 5:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
LOLLICUP USA INC.
Defendant:
PRECISION BIOTECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., INTERNATIONAL PRECISION CORP., MING-KUNG YEH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hill et al v. APM Terminals North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80016
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Hill et al v. Pacific Maritime Association et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
