Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bushansky v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04978
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Paul R. Auvil, Mark S. Blumenkranz and others
Finger v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06248
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Finger
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Bruce W. Dunlevie, David P. Kennedy and others
Kosman v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05453
Plaintiff:
Gary Kosman
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
George E. Schwindt v. Flogging Molly, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06979
Defendant:
Beggars Bush, Inc., Borstal Beat Records, LLC, Dennis J. Casey and others
Plaintiff:
George E. Schwindt
Bay Valley Professional Center, LLC v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2014cv02796
Plaintiff:
Bay Valley Professional Center, LLC
Defendant:
James M. Schmidt, Robert M. Schmidt, Mary Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bay Valley Professional Center, LLC v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2014cv02067
Plaintiff:
Bay Valley Professional Center, LLC
Defendant:
James M. Schmidt, Robert M. Schmidt, Mary Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schmidt et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
James M. Schmidt and Robert M. Schmidt
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Robert Coleman Schmidt v. Matthew Cate
as 5:2012cv02144
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
Robert Coleman Schmidt
Schmidt et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv05677
Plaintiff:
James M. Schmidt and Robert M. Schmidt
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Schmidt et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv02762
Plaintiff:
James M. Schmidt and Robert M. Schmidt
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
