Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Tylor v. TropicalTravel.Net LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Doe Associations 1-10, Annette S. Michael, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Khoury Tylor
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giles v. Felker et al
as 2:2016cv00937
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Giles
Defendant:
Tom Felker, R. K. Wong, James M Nachiondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Felker et al.
as 2:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Giles
Defendant:
Tom Felker, R.K. Wong, James M. Nachiondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Moreno et al
as 3:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
S. Michael Cohen
Defendant:
Rosa Moreno and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Post Rainbow, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01820
Defendant:
Arvset, LLC, Donald D. Borsack, Edward Borsack and others
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Ford Duneville, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01776
Defendant:
Donald D Borsack, Edward Borsack, James E Borsack and others
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dale Wills v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 09-15771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE G. WILLS
Respondent:
MATTHEW CATE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, JEANNE S. WOODFORD, ED ALAMEIDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
