Cases 1 - 10 of 568
Krannich Solar West LLC v. RALOS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Krannich Solar West LLC
Defendant:
RALOS LLC and Daniel Harder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Solares et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Solares and Estefania Correa
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
United States of America v. Ruiz-Hernandez
as 24-2759
Defendant:
JESUS RUIZ-HERNANDEZ and Christo Jesus Escobar Solares
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tanisha Tutson v. Sunpro Solar, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Tutson
Defendant:
Sunpro Solar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gordon v. Momentum Solar, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Paula Gordon
Defendant:
Momentum Solar, LLC and Coadvantage Resources 50, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
140 Blue Ravine, LLC v. Phoenix Motor, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
140 Blue Ravine, LLC
Defendant:
Phoenix Motor, Inc. and SPI Solar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
v. 140 Blue Ravine, LLC et al
as 2:2024at00453
Defendant:
140 Blue Ravine, LLC, SPI Solar, Inc. and Phoenix Motor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Brown v. Pacific Green Energy, LLC
as 2:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Brown
Defendant:
Pacific Green Energy, LLC Doing business as Apricot Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
