Cases 1 - 10 of 2,659
BMO Bank N.A. v. GSK Transport Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01753
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Defendant:
GSK Transport Inc. and Gagandeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GS Holistic, LLC v. Jeet Retail Inc et al
as 5:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Jeet Retail Inc doing business as Smokers 1st Choice and Kuljit Singh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
BMO Bank N.A. v. H&R Transport, et al.
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
H&R Transport and Harmandeep Singh Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. City of Piedmont et al
as 3:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
City of Piedmont, Brian Castillo and Jasdeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singh et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 3:2024cv03293
Plaintiff:
Daryn M. Singh, Deepak Singh and Lila Singh
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
