Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. LAX Enterprise, L.P.
as 2:2019cv09827
Plaintiff:
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C.
Defendant:
LAX Enterprise, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
John Prather v. Sprint Communications, Inc., et al
as 14-17434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
JOHN C. PRATHER
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., FKA Sprint Nextel Corporation and SPRINT PCS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sprint Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint PCS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. et al v. County of San Luis Obispo et al
as 8:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C., Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C., Ed Harden and others
Defendant:
County of San Luis Obispo, Board of Supervisors for the County of San Luis Obispo, Harry Ovitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-73932
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Real Party In Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Hesse, et al v. Sprint Corporation, et al
as 08-35235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER W. HESSE and NATHANIEL OLSON
Defendant:
SPRINT CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT SPECTRUM LP, doing business as Sprint PCS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
