Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and J. DOE
Defendant:
Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and Washoe County School District Superintendent, Dr. Susan Enfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Not Used
as 3:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Not Used
Defendant:
J. Doe, Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and J. Doe
Defendant:
Washoe County School District, Washoe County School District Board of Trustees and Washoe County School District Superintendent, Dr. Susan Endfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2018cv00147
Defendant:
Kathy Adams-Blackeye, Allen Ambler, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa George, Boyd Graham, Jacqueline Hodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chen v. Superintendent Lauer et al
as 2:2014cv01711
Petitioner:
Xue-Bao Chen
Respondent:
Henderson Detention and Superintendent Lauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Winnemucca Indian Colony et al v. United States of America Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2011cv00622
Intervenor Defendant:
Ms. Linda Ayer
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Superintendent of the Western Nevada Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Wasson and Winnemucca Indian Colony
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
