Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Estate of Nahal Connie Dadkhah et al v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nahal Connie Dadkhah and Manouchehr Dadkhah
Defendant:
City of San Diego, SDPD Chief David Nisleit, SDPD Officers Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Estate of Aaron Daniel Bonin et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Estate of Aaron Daniel Bonin and Barbara Brisson
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Kelly Martinez, Anthony Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Estate of Amanda Bews et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09775
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AMANDA BEWS, by and through its Successors-in-interest A.S.R., by and through her guardian MELINDA BETTENCOURT and R.E.H., by and through his guardian ROBERT HAMBY, MELINDA BETTENCOURT, Estate of Amanda Bews and others
Petitioner:
MEDICAL PROVIDER DOES 1-20
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ALEX VILLANUEVA, SEAN OBRIEN HENDERSON, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Estate of Lonnie Rupard et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Estate of Lonnie Rupard, Justino Rupard and Ronnie Rupard
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Bill Gore, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Estate of William Hayden Schuck et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Estate of William Hayden Schuck, Sabrina Schuck and Timothy Schuck
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Bill Gore, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
David Getzen v. J. Long, et al
as 21-16437
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID GETZEN
Defendant / Appellant:
J. LONG
Defendant:
COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, STATE OF ARIZONA, YAVAPAI COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
