Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Ameris Bank v. G and F Trucking TN LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02295
Plaintiff: Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant: G&F Trucking TN LLC, George Crout and G and F Trucking TN LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv01712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al v. Kaine Wen, et al
as 23-55700
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, STATE OF MINNESOTA, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant: KAINE WEN, in his individual capacity and as trustee of the Kaine Wen 2017 Trust, AKA Kaine Wen Dai, AKA Wen Ting Dai, AKA Wenting Kaine Dai
Defendant: CONSUMER ADVOCACY CENTER, INC., DBA Premier Student Loan Center, TRUE COUNT STAFFING, INC., DBA SL Account Management, PRIME CONSULTING, LLC, DBA Financial Preparation Services and others
Shelby County, TN et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06565
Plaintiff: Shelby County, TN, City of Millington, TN and Town of Arlington, TN
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grimsley et al v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01574
Defendant: Inmate Calling Solutions, Valley Family Health Care, Citizens United for the Rehabilitation of Errants and others
Plaintiff: Robert Alexander Grimsley, Leonardo Rafael Urquijo Arvizu, Steven Tyler Premo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Getzen v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-17246
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, BARTUCCIO, First name unknown; named as Bartucico, CO4, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as CEO - John Doe, Keefee Supply Inc. Co St. Louis, MO: CEO - John Doe, Direct Buy Tobbacco Products Inc. Hartville, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GETZEN
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Erica Barajas, et al
as 20-17185
Defendant / Appellee: TRANSCOR AMERICA, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, for DPS-HI, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Tan v. Quick Box, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01082
Defendant: Health & Body Care TN, Inc., Skin Beauty & Health JN, Inc., EW Radiant Skin Store, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Vibrant Face & Beauty Shop ATN, Inc., Diet and Beauty Enterprise JB, Inc., Beautiful Skin and Health SL, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Chad Biggins, Stephen Adele and Konnektive Corporation
Cross Claimant: Matthew Martorano, James Martell, Kathryn Martorano and others
Plaintiff: LeAnne Tan
3Rd Party Defendant: Rocket Management Group, LLC and Kiet Liu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv01998
Defendant: Tuong Nguyen, Albert Kim, Kaine Wen and others
Receiver: Thomas W McNamara
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, The People of the State of California and others
Petitioner: Edu Doc Support, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?