Cases 1 - 10 of 29
De'Marian Clemons v. Tanya Hill
as 17-15267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE'MARIAN A. CLEMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANYA HILL
Pascua v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01738
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Bridget Pascua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Horton et al
as 2:2016cv01175
Defendant:
Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill, Sherrie Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stevens v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv00277
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Roberta Ann Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarz Mitchell v. USDC-NVL
as 14-70564
:
In re: TARZ DEMONE MITCHELL
Petitioner:
TARZ DEMONE MITCHELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
GREG COX, BRIAN WILLIAMS, CHERYL BURSON and others
Edward Finley v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 13-16717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01029
Defendant:
S. Brooks, Cheryl Burson, T. Carlman and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Dr. Arera, R. Bannister, S. Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
