Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Epic Systems Corporation v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited et al
as 2:2015mc00005
Plaintiff:
Epic Systems Corporation
ThirdParty Defendant:
Philippe Guionnet
Defendant:
Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Limited
County of Orange v. USDC-CASA
as 14-72343
:
In re: COUNTY OF ORANGE
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political subdivision of the State of California
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Real Party In Interest:
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD, an Indian corporation and TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a New York corporation
County of Orange v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd et al
as 8:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
County of Orange
Defendant:
Tata America International Corporation and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. v. Tata America International Corporation
as 1:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc.
Respondent:
Tata America International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Gopi Vedachalam, et al v. Tata America International Cor, et al
as 08-15521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GOPI VEDACHALAM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and KANGANA BERI
Defendant - Appellant:
TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD., an Indian corporation and TATA SONS, LTD., an Indian corporation
Vedachalam v. Tata America International Corporation et al
as 4:2006cv00963
Plaintiff:
Gopi Vedachalam and Kangana Beri
Defendant:
Tata America International Corporation, Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd and Tata Sons, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
