Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hasty v. US Forest Service et al
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Barry Hasty
Defendant:
US Forest Service and Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Oregon Wild et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dunlap et al v. Secretary of Agriculture et al
as 2:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Dunlap and James Dunlap
Defendant:
Zach Ducheneaux, Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Black Farmers Association and Association of American Indian Farmers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hilburn, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 3:2016cv02116
Plaintiff:
Community Action Resources Enterprises, Inc., Lily Hilburn, Lisa McFalls and others
Defendant:
Gaylord George and Vicky Shiveley Trust, Tony Hernandez, Lisa Mensah and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Juliana, et al v United States of America, et al
as 6:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jaime B., Nathaniel B., Victoria B. and others
Defendant:
Ashton Carter, Shaun Donovan, Anthony Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
