Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Michael Sporn v. TransUnion Interactive, Inc.
as 19-80007
Undetermined:
TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC. and MICHAEL SPORN
Michael Sporn v. TransUnion Interactive, Inc.
as 19-15088
Defendant / Appellee:
TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SPORN
Sporn v. TransUnion Interactive, Inc.
as 4:2018cv05424
Defendant:
TransUnion Interactive, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Sporn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chudner v. TransUnion Interactive, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chudner, Jeffrey Chudner, Jeffrey Chudner and others
Defendant:
TransUnion Interactive, Inc. and Trans Union LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
