Cases 1 - 10 of 34
J. Aguirre, et al v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al
as 23-55315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. AGUIRRE, J. ROLDAN, J. STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
J. Aguirre et al v. Alejandro Villanueva et al
as 2:2022cv07435
Plaintiff:
J. AGUIRRE, J. ROLDAN, J. STANLEY and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
V. Lopez v. Alejandro Villanueva et al
as 2:2022cv05470
Plaintiff:
V. Lopez
Defendant:
Alejandro Villanueva, Kathryn Barger, Janice Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E. GUZMAN v. ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA et al
as 2:2022cv05462
Plaintiff:
V. LOPEZ
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Fluidra USA LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Zodiac Pool Systems LLC, Fluidra USA LLC and Cover-Pools Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Thomas V. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Elizabeth V. Lopez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00306
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth V. Lopez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016at00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dolly Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated, et al
as 13-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLLY G. TETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BORST AUTOMOTIVE INCORPORATED, CARLA SOTOMAYOR, JAN E. KEARNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
