Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Meineke Car Care Centers, LLC v. Keller & Sons, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01305
Defendant:
DOES, Michael W. Keller, Ryan A. Keller and others
Counter Claimant:
Michael W. Keller, Ryan A. Keller, Keller & Sons, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Meineke Car Care Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Meineke Car Care Centers, LLC
Ann Keller et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Ann Keller, Kimberley Keller, Robert W. Keller and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 8:2010ml02151
Plaintiff:
Vilsaint Georges, Willette Riley, Narcisso Pimentel and others
Defendant:
Doe Trucking Company, New United Motor Manufacturing Inc, Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc. and others
Special Master:
John K Trotter, Patrick A Juneau and Steven Stone
Petitioner:
Estate of Estelle Gottesman, Tanya Ross, Cassandra McNair-Stepney and others
Not Classified By Court:
Brenda Kaycee Howell Nimota, Housan Huang, Margaret Strohlein and others
Interested Party:
Betsy Benjaminson, Brevard County Board of County Commissioners, Denso Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael Barr and Larry W. Jenkins
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Sean Kane and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Intervenor:
Wolverine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 18 Acres of Land et al
as 3:2009cv05660
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
18 Acres of Land, Daniel W Keller, James F Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Keller v. CIR
as 06-75466
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. KELLER
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Keller v. CIR
as 06-75441
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. KELLER
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
