Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Inland Valley Investments, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01417
Plaintiff: Borrego Community Health Foundation
Defendant: Inland Valley Investments, LLC, DRP Holdings, LLC, Promenade Square, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ri Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Keith Trout v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16177
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEITH TROUT, as the proposed guardian ad litem of minor DA, minor JG1, minor JG2 and minor JG3
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF MADERA, a domestic municipal corporation, COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MADERA COUNTY, INC., a domestic corporation, MARTHA DIAZ SHELTER, a business entity, form unknown and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04774
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Nadezhda Jones v. Mark Ghaly, et al
as 22-15749
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADEZHDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee: MARK GHALY, as Secretary of California Health and Human Services Agency, WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, California Department of Health Services, CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY and others
Nadezhda Jones v. Regents of the University of California, et al
as 22-15750
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADEZHDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BIANA ROYKH, WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, California Department of Health Services and others
Jones v. Regents of the University of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv07844
Plaintiff: Nadezhda Jones
Defendant: Regents of the University of California, Biana Roykh, Will Lightbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trout et al v. County of Madera et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv06061
Plaintiff: Keith Trout, Dallas Alvarado, Jayden Garay and others
Defendant: County of Madera, Community Action Partnership of Madera County, Inc., Martha Diaz Shelter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dignity Health, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16295
Plaintiff / Appellant: DIGNITY HEALTH, a California non-profit corporation and DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Plaintiff: SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant / Appellee: WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
San Joaquin Community Hospital, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16294
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit reiigious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Bakersfield, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation and as successor in interest to Central Valley General Hospital, fka Central Valley General Hospital, DBA Adventist Health Hanford, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Feather River and others
Defendant / Appellee: WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
Defendant: RICHARD FIGUEROA
Jones v. Ghaly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05828
Plaintiff: Jones Nadezhda and Nadezhda Jones
Defendant: Mark Ghaly, Will Lightbourne, California Health and Human Services Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?